Fairtrade is a subject that has been extensively discussed
and this article will examine some of the wider issues of ethics and organic
cotton. Twenty years ago Organic cotton pioneers built their own supply chains
from scratch and created a new model which was based on a concept of
partnership. Farmers made a commitment to supply organically certified cotton
and retailers bought at a reasonable price, because the crop had to have
organic field certification to qualify for the final label on the garment a
link between the farmer and consumer is established.
Farmers who have converted to organic cotton are seeing
benefits in terms of their health and the environment and for the first time
enjoying a closer relationship with retailers. But this relationship is now
facing challenges as mainstream retailers are placing huge orders, whilst this
can bring opportunities to expand and benefit farmers, it will depend upon
whether the major companies continue to use the ethical and equitable trading
practices set up by the pioneers who are mainly relatively small businesses.
Sometimes it pays to look behind the advertising. For
example a well known high street retailer was recently having a huge marketing
campaign based on their tee shirts being made from Fairtrade cotton but this
did not extend to the garment manufacturing. So it is very easy to put a ‘spin’
on things with clever marketing and things are not always what they seem.
Production of cotton is a crucial part of the economy of many
third world countries with millions of people dependent on it for their
livelihood. Fifty years ago ‘white gold’ was seen as the great hope for
developing countries but these dreams have faltered with cotton farmers barely
able to make a living and in debt to pesticide suppliers. Chemically intensive
cotton production and mono culture has contaminated soil and water resources
and reduced fertility of the soil. Effects on the environment and workers
health has been devastating. There is very little known about the chronic
effects of being continually exposed to pesticides. It has been suggested that
deaths as a result are underestimated as few workers have access to medical
diagnosis and treatment.
Only over about the last twenty years have the social, environmental
and health impacts of cotton begun to be considered. This is due to the
complexities of the supply chain for conventionally grown cotton which makes it
difficult for consumers to be aware of the beginnings of the chain. We have now
been made aware of the issues faced by traders who buy from spinning mills who
deal with traders worldwide. Fibres are blended and are not traceable to their
point of origin. In the case of organic cotton the fibre needs to be separate
from conventional cotton fibre and cannot therefore enter the same supply
chain. With conventional cotton there is such a long chain of buyers and
manufacturers clothing retailers shop around for the cheapest fabric and the
growers at the end of the chain are squeezed to the maximum so that the price
of their product falls. They see the only way forward as increasing their yield
with increased use of chemicals; eventually pests begin to develop resistance
and the yield decreases. American and European subsidies push the price down
even further and this way third world countries are kept poor and in debt to
the Agrochemical giants who maintain a healthy profit.
Benefits of organic cotton to the environment and growers
are well documented but what is not so often recognized is the fairer supply
chain due to the work done by the organic cotton pioneers. Pioneering cotton
companies have also undertaken to share the risks which are daunting.
Agriculture is subject to forces which we are not able to control in terms of
adverse weather and climate. There is no safety net for third world cotton farmers
and banks that see them as high risk charge exorbitant interest rates for loans
and overdrafts. Pre financing by arranging input advances during the growing is
a central aspect of a Fair trading model.
Now that the high street giants have seen the marketing
potential of organic cotton there are new challenges to be faced. Will these
giants continue with the trading standards set up by the organic cotton
pioneers or will they expect to continue with the practices they have always
imposed on their suppliers such as making them wait 90 days for payment? It is
imperative that they set up new ways of working and do not rely on their size
and power to impose unfair conditions. It is also important that they continue
to uphold the pre finance support, listen to what farmers say and understand
and develop the principles of the organic agricultural model. It is critical to
fair and ethical practice that we continue to have clarity throughout the
supply chain.